Beaumont Discusses Proposed Legislative Solution to Libor Transition in Law360

March 27, 2019

Friedman Kaplan litigation partner Anne Beaumont has published an expert analysis article in Law360 titled "Legislative Fix For Post-Libor Issues Seems Improbable."

In the article, Ms. Beaumont discusses legislation that the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York are considering asking the New York State Legislature to pass that would apply to certain types of existing or “legacy” contracts referencing Libor.  The purpose of the legislation would be to address an expected backlog of potentially thousands of contracts that cannot practicably be amended prior to the end of 2021. The contemplated legislation currently is focused on floating rate notes and securitizations because, to change a term such as the interest rate, they generally require unanimous noteholder consent, which would be nearly impossible to obtain. An inability to amend such contracts would mean that either they would have no fallback language at all, leaving holders and issuers alike in a quandary as to the applicable interest rate, or they would convert to a fixed rate, such as the last-quoted Libor. 

Ms. Beaumont identifies and discusses two potential obstacles to the use of legislation to address this issue. For one, there is a serious question whether there is the political interest or will on the part of lawmakers to pass such a statute given that it will result in an economic advantage to some counterparties at the expense of others. Moreover, even if the interest and will are there, such a statute could run afoul of the United States Constitution or the New York State Constitution. 

In light of these considerations, Ms. Beaumont concludes that, although the ARRC’s desire to address the significant operational challenges presented by the need to amend thousands of contracts is understandable, doing so by amending contracts wholesale through legislation, and without the knowledge or consent of at least some of the parties to those contracts, seems likely to be unworkable.

The full article can be found here.

View Document(s):

Attorneys

Friedman Kaplan Seiler Adelman & Robbins LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek